Close Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Trauma Leadership
    • Program Management
    • System Leadership
    • Trauma Registry
    • Prehospital Trauma
    • Trauma Research
    • Trauma Conferences
  • Trauma Care
  • Jobs
    • Post a Job
    • Employer Dashboard
  • Virtual Summit on Geriatric Trauma
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • (Webinar) Trauma Program Leaders: How to Talk So Revenue Cycle Will Listen
  • ACS clarifies requirements in 10 trauma center standards
  • Research: Over half of severely injured patients first seen at Level III trauma centers or NTCs not transferred to higher-level care
  • Opinion: Military hospitals must not be excluded from civilian trauma systems
  • (Webinar) Effective Strategies for Reducing Length of Stay for Trauma Patients
  • Study identifies 6 gaps in state trauma registry development
  • Trauma Survey Notebook: ACS Level I reverification review in New York City
  • BCEN burn nursing certification now accredited and Magnet-accepted
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trauma System News
  • Home
  • About
  • Trauma Leadership
    • Program Management
    • System Leadership
    • Trauma Registry
    • Prehospital Trauma
    • Trauma Research
    • Trauma Conferences
  • Trauma Care
  • Jobs
    • Post a Job
    • Employer Dashboard
  • Virtual Summit on Geriatric Trauma
Trauma System News
Photo: Dirk Cuys

A process improvement framework for trauma

0
By Tracy Lauzon on July 7, 2017 Trauma Quality

When your trauma program gets a poor result on its TQIP Benchmark Report, you need an organized way to turn ideas into action. Here is the framework we use at my Level II trauma center:

  • Issue identified: What issue or area of opportunity have you identified?
  • Key stakeholders: Who do you need help from and what do you need them to do? (e.g., data collection, chart review, data analysis, financial information, etc.)
  • Action plan: What is your plan for improving performance? What is the timeline for implementation?
  • Implementation: Who is responsible for implementing your plan? Do you need additional resources? What is the timeline for reevaluating the plan?
  • Evaluation: Was the plan effective? Evaluate your results, determine any barriers, identify opportunities for improvement and plan next steps.

My colleagues and I used this process to address an issue with VTE prophylaxis (see How to use TQIP Benchmark Reports to drive performance Improvement).

The key is to develop a process that works for you and your program. There is no one right way to look at process improvement. That is what makes trauma PI so exciting!

Tracy Lauzon, MSN, BSN, RN, CNML is director of trauma services/registry analyst at the Medical Center of Aurora in Aurora, Colorado. She is also a site reviewer for the American College of Surgeons and the State of Colorado.

Author

  • Tracy Lauzon

Related Posts

When to use case review and when to use aggregate review in trauma PI

3 trauma quality projects from the 2025 Distinguished TCRN

(Webinar) Trauma PI Strategy: Leveraging “Case Review vs. Aggregate Review” for More Efficient Loop Closure

Comments are closed.

About Trauma System News

Trauma System News is the only information channel dedicated to trauma center and trauma system leadership and management. Find out more.

SiteLock
Copyright © 2024 Trauma System News

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.