Close Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Trauma Leadership
    • Program Management
    • System Leadership
    • Trauma Registry
    • Prehospital Trauma
    • Trauma Research
    • Trauma Conferences
  • Trauma Care
  • Jobs
    • Post a Job
    • Employer Dashboard
  • Virtual Summit on Trauma Data Management
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • Trauma Survey Notebook: ACS Level II reverification review in Colorado
  • 3 trauma quality projects from the 2025 Distinguished TCRN
  • Nominate your trauma program or health system for a 2025 National Certification Champion Award
  • 7 questions trauma nurses should ask when transporting a patient to a higher level of care
  • (Webinar) Trauma PI Strategy: Leveraging “Case Review vs. Aggregate Review” for More Efficient Loop Closure
  • 4 complications of brain injury that trauma nurses must identify quickly
  • It’s time to right-size and refocus the Military Health System
  • 5 ways to build communication skills for better trauma resuscitations
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trauma System News
  • Home
  • About
  • Trauma Leadership
    • Program Management
    • System Leadership
    • Trauma Registry
    • Prehospital Trauma
    • Trauma Research
    • Trauma Conferences
  • Trauma Care
  • Jobs
    • Post a Job
    • Employer Dashboard
  • Virtual Summit on Trauma Data Management
Trauma System News
Photo: Jenny Starley

New Level II and III trauma centers reduced Level I volumes, mortality

0
By Trauma News on October 30, 2014 Research

Accrediting new Level II and Level III trauma centers reduced the trauma patient census at a Level I trauma center in Pennsylvania, according to a research brief publishing this month in the Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. However, the mortality rate of patients at the Level I center decreased.

The study examined 10 years of monthly trauma patient volumes at a Pennsylvania Level I trauma center. During the second half of that period, the state accredited one Level II trauma center and three Level III trauma centers within 46 miles. “Ultimately, the Level I center treated 1,903 fewer patients than expected over 51 months, an 11.9% volume reduction, and patient severity remained consistent but mortality decreased.”

The authors of the study note that regional systems need to plan strategically to balance the goals of rapid care with maintaining adequate patient volumes at top-level trauma centers. Read Abstract

Related Posts

Survey will explore the state of trauma education

Study: Trauma PI should prioritize pneumonia prevention

Advanced prehospital care teams could reduce preventable trauma deaths

Comments are closed.

About Trauma System News

Trauma System News is the only information channel dedicated to trauma center and trauma system leadership and management. Find out more.

SiteLock
Copyright © 2024 Trauma System News

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.