Close Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Trauma Leadership
    • Program Management
    • System Leadership
    • Trauma Registry
    • Prehospital Trauma
    • Trauma Research
    • Trauma Conferences
  • Trauma Care
  • Jobs
    • Post a Job
    • Employer Dashboard
  • Virtual Summit on Trauma Data Management
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • Trauma Survey Notebook: ACS Level II reverification review in Colorado
  • 3 trauma quality projects from the 2025 Distinguished TCRN
  • Nominate your trauma program or health system for a 2025 National Certification Champion Award
  • 7 questions trauma nurses should ask when transporting a patient to a higher level of care
  • (Webinar) Trauma PI Strategy: Leveraging “Case Review vs. Aggregate Review” for More Efficient Loop Closure
  • 4 complications of brain injury that trauma nurses must identify quickly
  • It’s time to right-size and refocus the Military Health System
  • 5 ways to build communication skills for better trauma resuscitations
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trauma System News
  • Home
  • About
  • Trauma Leadership
    • Program Management
    • System Leadership
    • Trauma Registry
    • Prehospital Trauma
    • Trauma Research
    • Trauma Conferences
  • Trauma Care
  • Jobs
    • Post a Job
    • Employer Dashboard
  • Virtual Summit on Trauma Data Management
Trauma System News
Photo: Kamal Hamid

ACS: Patient Need, Not Economic Advantage, Should Guide Trauma Center Designation

0
By Robert Fojut on January 3, 2015 System Leadership

The American College of Surgeons (ACS) released a statement Thursday urging health system leaders to base trauma center designation decisions on the needs of injured patients. The statement includes recommendations for optimizing trauma center allocation within regional trauma systems.

The “Statement on Trauma Center Designation Based Upon System Need” was developed by the ACS Committee on Trauma and approved by the society’s board of regents. According to the statement:

  • Few regional trauma systems have developed the ability to allocate trauma center resources based strictly on population need.
  • Government trauma oversight agencies are often unable to make controversial designation decisions. Some have “abdicated their responsibility” for trauma center designation altogether.
  • In this environment, the economic ambitions of individual provider organizations often drive the trauma center designation process.

“The problem arises when a lead agency passively allows health care organizations and hospital groups to establish new trauma centers in areas that yield an economic advantage, while ignoring areas of true need,” the statement read. “Such uncontrolled growth of trauma centers — some of which may lack long-term commitment — has the potential to undermine the quality of trauma care within a region, creating areas of oversupply and adverse competition while ignoring underserved areas entirely.”

Planning guidelines
The statement repeated the ACS position that trauma center designation should be the responsibility of a government agency with authority for the regional trauma system. “The lead agency must have a strong mandate, clear statutory authority, and the political will to execute this responsibility.”

System leaders should use appropriate measures to assess regional trauma care needs, including measures of access, quality, population mortality and system efficiency, according to the statement. Specific measures could include:

  • Number of Level I and Level II trauma centers per 1 million population
  • Percentage of the population within 1 hour of a Level I or Level II trauma center
  • Emergency medical services (EMS) transport times
  • Percentage of severely injured patients who receive care at a trauma center

The ACS called on clinicians and system leaders to advocate for patient-focused regional trauma planning. Physicians, nurses, EMS providers and others have a “professional obligation” to work together to ensure that patient needs come before the interests of individual healthcare organizations. Read the Full Statement

Related Posts

It’s time to right-size and refocus the Military Health System

Blood “hand-off” system improves care for rural trauma patients

Rural trauma centers cut transfer times for “Red Box” patients

Comments are closed.

About Trauma System News

Trauma System News is the only information channel dedicated to trauma center and trauma system leadership and management. Find out more.

SiteLock
Copyright © 2024 Trauma System News

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.